←back to thread

116 points rbanffy | 4 comments | | HN request time: 0.815s | source
Show context
MichaelZuo ◴[] No.42131937[source]
It’s very surprising they didn’t continue this style of meeting, some sort of internal IEEE disagreement seems the most likely reason to me, but the evidence is probably lost to time now…
replies(2): >>42132047 #>>42134172 #
1. KK7NIL ◴[] No.42132047[source]
Extremely expensive long distance fees seem much more likely and also explains why it didn't catch on with other groups.
replies(1): >>42132625 #
2. MichaelZuo ◴[] No.42132625[source]
Hence, an internal disagreement between the original promoters and the accountants/other factions.
replies(1): >>42132677 #
3. KK7NIL ◴[] No.42132677[source]
No, I think they all agreed not to waste the association's money on vanity long distance calls.

As the article pointed out at the end, it's very likely this special conference call was only possible due to special sponsorship from a big donor or telephone companies.

replies(1): >>42132941 #
4. MichaelZuo ◴[] No.42132941{3}[source]
Hence… an internal disgareement… between the original faction that convinced the sponsors/budgeting groups/etc… and the naysayers.