←back to thread

249 points jaboutboul | 3 comments | | HN request time: 0.205s | source
Show context
neilv ◴[] No.42131010[source]
> "This is obvious political retribution by the outgoing administration against Polymarket for providing a market that correctly called the 2024 presidential election," a Polymarket spokesperson tells Axios.

When I saw that statement, from a company spokesperson, it was striking.

Is it now respectable and advisable for a corporation to make official statements like this?

replies(11): >>42131031 #>>42131033 #>>42131037 #>>42131288 #>>42131422 #>>42131547 #>>42131653 #>>42131753 #>>42132315 #>>42132991 #>>42136393 #
1. n2d4 ◴[] No.42131653[source]
Ridiculous is also that they say this when Polymarket gave Trump only 60%-40% odds. They're falling for the same logical fallacy as everyone who knows nothing about prediction markets.
replies(2): >>42133643 #>>42134633 #
2. vdvsvwvwvwvwv ◴[] No.42133643[source]
Polymarket is a market. Not sure if AMM or order book but whatever. Anyone attempting to control it wasting money.
3. tachash1 ◴[] No.42134633[source]
Polymarket also had Harris at 70% to win the popular vote right up to election day, which has transpired to be wrong. Plus; all the betting markets had similar odds for Trump winning; smarket, predictit etc.