←back to thread

Porygon Was Innocent: An epileptic perspective on the infamous Pokémon episode

(www.animefeminist.com)
162 points Aissen | 2 comments | 13 Nov 24 19:48 UTC | HN request time: 0.485s | source
Show context
siva7 ◴[13 Nov 24 23:23 UTC] No.42131339[source]▶
> In an ideal world, the animators in 1997 should absolutely have been aware of the risk using flashing lights could cause, but in reality, their ignorance is understandable.

Cmon, just 600 out of 7 million people experienced this. You have my sympathy but we can’t take every imaginable condition into account and make it a legal requirement. Just today i’ve read that Costco called back all their butter to destroy it because they forgot to print that butter contains milk. It’s getting absurd.

replies(3): >>42131441 #>>42131464 #>>42141695 #
1. gnulinux ◴[13 Nov 24 23:37 UTC] No.42131441[source]▶
> Just today i’ve read that Costco called back all their butter to destroy it because they forgot to print that butter contains milk.

Oh no! What will these multi-billion dollar companies do? Who is there to protect them? I think maybe we should create a foundation of sorts that we can all invest our money in to advocate for the rights of Costco et al. It seems like otherwise the evil government will cause too much damage on them while trying not to kill people due to allergy attacks or medical insensitivities. I can't ever imagine a situation where saving at most one or perhaps two hypothetical human lives being worth the risk of causing a butter recall. Someone should protect shareholder profits no matter the consequences, and especially if the consequences are so minor (just a few possible deaths) compared to thousands of dollars in profits shareholders can make.

replies(1): >>42136528 #
2. 1317 ◴[14 Nov 24 14:43 UTC] No.42136528[source]▶
if you need a warning that butter contains milk, frankly you had it coming