←back to thread

283 points belter | 1 comments | | HN request time: 0.199s | source
Show context
SpicyLemonZest ◴[] No.42130414[source]
I dunno. I don't like the idea of companies holding inquisitions on just how disabled people are, but if we're going to hold the expansive view of disabilities the article takes for granted it seems inevitable. When someone claims that they're unable to work in an office because they're suffering from a stress disorder, it's reasonable to have some followup questions about how they manage the disorder on other occasions that call for them to leave home.
replies(7): >>42130478 #>>42130480 #>>42130501 #>>42130556 #>>42130654 #>>42131373 #>>42131403 #
1. A4ET8a8uTh0 ◴[] No.42131373[source]
<< When someone claims that they're unable to work in an office because they're suffering from a stress disorder, it's reasonable to have some followup questions about how they manage the disorder on other occasions that call for them to leave home.

I personally went through the whole HR to get approved for WFH after pandemic subsided and my former job decided to bring everyone in. I went with doctor's notes on stress and everything. I was offered a room to have a quiet moment in and (edit: ) told I can use FMLA if I want. I quit as soon as I found a new position ( the timing was fortunate too, because that was at the very end of the 'appeals' process so I was able to send an emphatic no email ). It did not feel as good as had hoped.

Still, I completely buy that there are people who will 'abuse' the system, but I also agree with you that HR drone determining whether I fit a set of criteria listed on its chart ( and every company in US is a little different... ) does eventually get to you. For one, they are not my doctor. I remember snapping pretty hard at one girl and I had a visit from VP about my behavior.

Honestly, I do not think WFH is too much to ask given it has been proven to work.