←back to thread

283 points belter | 2 comments | | HN request time: 0.425s | source
Show context
SpicyLemonZest ◴[] No.42130414[source]
I dunno. I don't like the idea of companies holding inquisitions on just how disabled people are, but if we're going to hold the expansive view of disabilities the article takes for granted it seems inevitable. When someone claims that they're unable to work in an office because they're suffering from a stress disorder, it's reasonable to have some followup questions about how they manage the disorder on other occasions that call for them to leave home.
replies(7): >>42130478 #>>42130480 #>>42130501 #>>42130556 #>>42130654 #>>42131373 #>>42131403 #
danudey ◴[] No.42130556[source]
> someone claims that they're unable to work in an office because they're suffering from a stress disorder, it's reasonable to have some followup questions about how they manage the disorder on other occasions that call for them to leave home.

No it's not. It makes no sense to say "oh, you can't commute to work and then home again five times a week? so how do you get groceries?" because those are two completely separate things in completely separate environments.

It's none of Amazon's business how people manage their disabilities outside of work. The only thing that matters is what the most effective way of managing their disabilities is inside of work. Amazon is not your doctor, and if your doctor says that this is the most effective way for you to manage things while being productive then they need to accept that the doctor knows what they're doing.

replies(2): >>42130627 #>>42131084 #
benced ◴[] No.42130627[source]
This falls apart the second you realize it's trivial to find a doctor who will say or do literally whatever you want if you pay the right amount.
replies(3): >>42130684 #>>42130701 #>>42130735 #
no_wizard ◴[] No.42130684[source]
Actual instances of disability accommodation at work being abused aren't exactly rampant.

Part of which is that people face lots of stigma around disabilities still, but also the need to have some historical and diagnoses paperwork is a barrier that I suspect lots of people don't want to go through.

Frankly, I don't believe its rampant to begin with, and I can't find any real evidence that supports that people are widely abusing these accommodation requests.

replies(5): >>42130792 #>>42130891 #>>42130918 #>>42131148 #>>42131462 #
1. gotoeleven ◴[] No.42131148[source]
Peer comment mentions the ridiculous "emotional support dogs" situation. Another example is the ridiculous abuse of ADD diagnoses to get extra time on tests. Oh and CA just had to roll back and fire, respectively, the soft on crime laws (prop 14) and public officials (oakland mayor, los angeles DA) because, surprise surprise, they lead to way more crime. People respond to incentives even if you don't think they do. Lots of people who work from home don't do much work.
replies(1): >>42131224 #
2. no_wizard ◴[] No.42131224[source]
All of these examples have nothing to do with disability accommodations at work.

Lots of people in offices don't do much work too. I mean, that was true before people worked from home. Can you actually cite any statistics that prove this is a widespread, pervasive issue?

Anecdotal evidence only seems to serve proof that you're annoyed at a bunch of things people do in society and somehow that means accommodations in the workplace for people with disabilities must also have the same perceived issues.