←back to thread

Why the Guardian is no longer posting on X

(www.theguardian.com)
243 points Jimmc414 | 3 comments | 13 Nov 24 20:58 UTC | HN request time: 0.598s | source
Show context
Sol2Sol ◴[13 Nov 24 22:10 UTC] No.42130660[source]▶
I don't have a problem with Musk supporting one candidate or the other. But I do have a problem with Musk apparently tweaking the algorithm to specifically promote one candidate and to bombard me with political content that skews a certain way even when I selected other interests or never used the platform to engage in political discourse. This while bellowing about X being a platform for free and open speech.

I realize that in this epoch we are living in the only rule is that money and power gives you the right to do as you please. This may be old school but I think that values, honesty and ethics matter too and should guide our behaviors in life and in business. Kudos to the Guardian for taking a stand even if it costs them a few dollars.

replies(4): >>42130793 #>>42130811 #>>42131571 #>>42133540 #
selivanovp ◴[13 Nov 24 22:21 UTC] No.42130793[source]▶
I do not know if Musk tweaked the algorithm in favor of Trump as I've left Twitter several years ago due to getting tired of propaganda bots. But what I do know is that Google and Facebook (as well as previous Twitter owners) practicing targeted propaganda for years already, pushing political agenda in your throat no matter how you ask them to not recommend you specific authors, channels or topics. I don't think we actually have any social platform for free and open speech.
replies(1): >>42131007 #
1. jasonfarnon ◴[13 Nov 24 22:40 UTC] No.42131007[source]▶
Don't forget youtube. Of course, when they were doing that, it wasn't "pushing political agenda" it was just "doing what's right" and "respecting the rights of others".

Are there books recounting the history of editorial positions put forth by these platforms? I really had no idea where google stood on political issues in the 2000s. I remember thinking they were quite pro-free speech sometimes callously so through that decade. I do remember them putting forth issues on gay marriage when it was a live political issue, though.

replies(2): >>42131772 #>>42133381 #
2. tzs ◴[14 Nov 24 00:24 UTC] No.42131772[source]▶
I watch a lot of YouTube, often without an ad blocker, and I see almost no political content on my home page. The only place I regular saw political content was in the in-video ads which appeared to be just normal paid ads purchased by the campaigns.
replies(1): >>42133347 #
3. selivanovp ◴[14 Nov 24 05:22 UTC] No.42133347[source]▶
It depends on what country you live in. Youtube was throwing Navalny and his friends videos into my feed no matter the "don't recommend videos from this channel" button. It somewhat lowered the intensity, but they still tried to mix their political agenda into my feed.