←back to thread

243 points Jimmc414 | 1 comments | | HN request time: 0.397s | source
Show context
seydor ◴[] No.42130473[source]
Yann Lecun is also telling everyone on Twitter very loudly that he won't be posting on Twitter.

The Guardian in another article explains that they are annoyed because Musk used twitter to promote his preferred candidate.

The Guardian itself used their own platform to publicly endorse Harris.

This deja-vu of childish antics is just comical in 2024

replies(18): >>42130525 #>>42130571 #>>42130597 #>>42130616 #>>42130620 #>>42130694 #>>42130705 #>>42130752 #>>42130802 #>>42130828 #>>42130857 #>>42130892 #>>42130907 #>>42131498 #>>42131663 #>>42131841 #>>42132444 #>>42134987 #
adastra22 ◴[] No.42130525[source]
> The Guardian itself used their own platform to publicly endorse Harris.

Isn’t The Guardian a UK publication?

replies(6): >>42130540 #>>42130548 #>>42130594 #>>42130812 #>>42131198 #>>42135012 #
1. skissane ◴[] No.42130594[source]
> Isn’t The Guardian a UK publication?

Yes and no. For many decades they only operated in the UK. More recently they have launched digital-only US and Australia editions, whose editors are based in the US and Australia respectively, creating content aimed at each country’s audience using local journalists, but the three editions share content for stories of global significance. But still their HQ is in the UK, and I believe their UK staff and readerships are significantly larger than their US or Australia operations