←back to thread

346 points obscurette | 2 comments | | HN request time: 0.502s | source
Show context
Fin_Code ◴[] No.42116404[source]
What is missing in edtech is a concept of progress and partial correctness and guess work. The primary input in edtech is multiple choice. This is selected so a person does not need to evaluate the answer making it cheaper. But leads to kids guessing. Starting a blank line to write a response is what really kicks the brain in. There is no easy way out.

We could replicate the same blank page and grayscale human response to questions. But then we have not made a cheap factory that reduces costs. Its the typical fast, good, cheap conundrum. Everyone keeps picking cheap and getting mad when it does not work.

replies(1): >>42116554 #
scott_w ◴[] No.42116554[source]
> But leads to kids guessing.

Or, almost as bad, kids learning to approximate the answer. I aced too many multiple-choice physics exams in my GCSEs because the multiple choice was A) 1,000,000 B) 1,000 C) 100 D) 10. Without knowing the formula I was able to eyeball which numbers looked obviously wrong and just select the closest.

replies(4): >>42116575 #>>42116940 #>>42117276 #>>42117422 #
1. ovi256 ◴[] No.42116940[source]
That sounds lovely and my guess is that order-of-magnitude estimation was the tested skill
replies(1): >>42119942 #
2. scott_w ◴[] No.42119942[source]
Honestly I think you’re giving British exam boards more credit than they deserve. You options were so ridiculous that you only needed to pay attention for 2 minutes out of a 1 hour lesson to realise what the answer was.

In fact, I’d go as far as to say I left the exam hall still none the wiser of what the actual formulae were!