←back to thread

169 points isaacfrond | 1 comments | | HN request time: 0.209s | source
Show context
CM30 ◴[] No.42071706[source]
To be fair, it kinda makes sense. The person best equipped to criticise a game or work is probably often someone who's experienced it for the longest. That way, they get to know all the things that don't add up, get repetitive on repeat playthroughs, various UI and UX annoyances that get worse the more you experience them, etc.

There's a reason the biggest fans of a game or film or TV series tend to give some of the harshest criticism, and why the most active users of a tool or program tend to have the most to say about it.

replies(3): >>42071794 #>>42072475 #>>42072941 #
1. lofaszvanitt ◴[] No.42072941[source]
Nah, 8000 hours means something is wrong. If you played a game that long, you just can't give a negative review. It also means you are hooked and you need to touch grass, or you need someone to delete your account and get on with your life.

1 year of your life playing a game is just plain wrong, sorry to say that, but that's the reality.