←back to thread

Passport Photos

(maxsiedentopf.com)
658 points gaws | 1 comments | | HN request time: 0.208s | source
Show context
rconti ◴[] No.42070771[source]
It's a lot of "fun" trying to get acceptable photos. Last week I went to my local American Automobile Association (AAA) office to get an International Driver's Permit (IDP). It's just a translation of your license, which is valid for 1 year. I had to take 2 passport-sized photos with me, which I did.

But I was told they wouldn't be accepted because I had long hair and a beard in them, but short hair and no beard now. That's absurd, because it's the same photo used in both of my passports, and there's no requirement that you don't alter your appearance from your passport photo. Somehow border guards can crack the code.

Amusingly, my California driver's license shows short hair and no beard, but the AAA person wasn't even looking at my CA license at the time. What happens if I grow long hair and a beard before I travel? Was he just trying to upsell me on a $9.99 photo?

We had a hell of a time getting the UK passport authorities to accept the photos we sent in for her passport; they recommend getting your photos taken at an "official" UK location where the digital photos are identified by a code you send in. Well, we happened to be traveling through Australia during this timeframe, so we were able to stop at an Australian Post Office, which supposedly had the same "digital" system, but instead of a code to send to the UK authorities, they handed us printed photos and a web link. Thankfully I was able to use the web link to download the photo and upload it to the UK site, where it was approved almost immediately, and the new passport arrived back at our home before we returned from our trip. But there's no user-obvious criteria that was being used to reject the SEVERAL rounds of photos we had sent to the UK earlier.

replies(12): >>42070852 #>>42070964 #>>42071064 #>>42071107 #>>42071658 #>>42071931 #>>42072138 #>>42072167 #>>42072168 #>>42072519 #>>42072942 #>>42073434 #
dwroberts ◴[] No.42071064[source]
The criteria for UK stuff is normally really clear? https://www.gov.uk/photos-for-passports

Can see how it would be annoying if they don't explain which criteria is being violated though

replies(1): >>42071255 #
rconti ◴[] No.42071255[source]
Yeah, the criteria is clear, but do everything you can to meet it, and the online submission will just say the photo quality is "poor" (unlikely to be approved) and not explain what's poor about it. I spent a lot of time juggling aspects of the photo itself as well as of the scan (DPI, compression, etc) and nothing seemed to make a difference.
replies(1): >>42072008 #
IanCal ◴[] No.42072008[source]
Anecdata from the other side, I've done a few passports for family now and it gives immediate ratings and we've not had any issue at all.
replies(1): >>42072573 #
1. rjh29 ◴[] No.42072573[source]
I took a phone selfie against a white wall and it was accepted fine.