←back to thread

Trudeau government bans TikTok from operating in Canada

(www.cbc.ca)
410 points empressplay | 6 comments | 06 Nov 24 23:04 UTC | HN request time: 0.63s | source | bottom
Show context
not2b ◴[07 Nov 24 00:01 UTC] No.42071538[source]▶
Instead of the laser focus on TikTok as a threat, it would be better for the US and Canada to have real data protection laws that would apply equally to TikTok, Meta, Google, Apple, and X. What the EU has done is far from perfect but it bans the worst practices. The Chinese can buy all of the information they want on Americans and Canadians from ad brokers, who will happily sell them everything they need to track individuals' locations.

Perhaps the way to get anti-regulation politicians on board with this is for someone to do what was done to Robert Bork and legally disclose lots of personal info on members of Congress/Parliament, obtained from data brokers and de-anonymized.

replies(8): >>42071557 #>>42071563 #>>42071688 #>>42071710 #>>42072099 #>>42072166 #>>42072254 #>>42072301 #
1. nextworddev ◴[07 Nov 24 00:03 UTC] No.42071563[source]▶
Safe to assume China already bought most of what’s available, but why give them additional video tokens / training data
replies(1): >>42071685 #
2. MPSFounder ◴[07 Nov 24 00:17 UTC] No.42071685[source]▶
I think his argument holds. We should apply the same standards to Meta. Zuckerberg has explicitly harmed our democracy. Let's treat all companies that are hostile and run by those that despise America with deep hostility (look no further than his private practices in Hawaii for examples). That's my personal opinion. The same standard is the most democratic path
replies(2): >>42071850 #>>42072483 #
3. ◴[07 Nov 24 00:35 UTC] No.42071850[source]▶
4. the_black_hand ◴[07 Nov 24 02:02 UTC] No.42072483[source]▶
I''m curious. Do you think it makes sense to treat an American company - one of the biggest btw, that pays taxes and creates jobs - the same way as a foreign company?
replies(1): >>42072803 #
5. A4ET8a8uTh0 ◴[07 Nov 24 02:45 UTC] No.42072803{3}[source]▶
I am not sure I understand the question. All companies should be subject to the basic rules and requirements under the law. It absolutely holds that one company should not be specifically targeted, just because it upsets current political ecosystem. If the rules allow it to exist, then the same end result is perfectly possible with other participants.

But what is happening here is different. We are saying: we don't Z company so we are going to treat them differently from the other companies in the same space.

And I am saying this as a person with minimal social media footprint.

replies(1): >>42073034 #
6. ◴[07 Nov 24 03:22 UTC] No.42073034{4}[source]▶