←back to thread

257 points tosh | 3 comments | | HN request time: 0.001s | source
Show context
turtlebits ◴[] No.42068395[source]
Is this really an AWS issue? Sounds like you were just burning CPU cycles, which is not AWS related. WebSockets makes it sound like it was a data transfer or API gateway cost.
replies(2): >>42068522 #>>42068890 #
VWWHFSfQ ◴[] No.42068522[source]
> Is this really an AWS issue?

I doubt they would have even noticed this outrageous cost if they were running on bare-metal Xeons or Ryzen colo'd servers. You can rent real 44-core Xeon servers for like, $250/month.

So yes, it's an AWS issue.

replies(1): >>42068676 #
JackSlateur ◴[] No.42068676[source]

  You can rent real 44-core Xeon servers for like, $250/month.
Where, for instance ?
replies(3): >>42068729 #>>42068739 #>>42068788 #
Faaak ◴[] No.42068729[source]
Hetzner for example. An EPYC 48c (96t) goes for 230 euros
replies(1): >>42068782 #
dilyevsky ◴[] No.42068782[source]
Hetzner network is complete dog. They also sell you machines that are long should be EOL’ed. No serious business should be using them
replies(3): >>42068965 #>>42069178 #>>42069210 #
blibble ◴[] No.42069210{4}[source]
I just cat'ed /proc/cpuinfo on my Hetzner and AWS machines

AWS: E5-2680 v4 (2016)

Hetzner: Ryzen 5 (2019)

replies(1): >>42071461 #
1. dilyevsky ◴[] No.42071461{5}[source]
Now do hard drives
replies(2): >>42072132 #>>42072929 #
2. blibble ◴[] No.42072132[source]
the hetzner one is a dedicated pcie 4.0 nvme device and wrote at 2.3GB/s (O_DIRECT)

the AWS one is some emulated block device, no idea what it is, other than it's 20x slower

3. luuurker ◴[] No.42072929[source]
You keep moving the goal posts with these replies.

Hetzner isn't the best provider in the world, but it's also not as bad as you say they are. They're not just renting old servers.