←back to thread

251 points slyall | 1 comments | | HN request time: 0.209s | source
Show context
DeathArrow ◴[] No.42058383[source]
I think neural nets are just a subset of machine learning techniques.

I wonder what would have happened if we poured the same amount of money, talent and hardware into SVMs, random forests, KNN, etc.

I don't say that transformers, LLMs, deep learning and other great things that happened in the neural network space aren't very valuable, because they are.

But I think in the future we should also study other options which might be better suited than neural networks for some classes of problems.

Can a very large and expensive LLM do sentiment analysis or classification? Yes, it can. But so can simple SVMs and KNN and sometimes even better.

I saw some YouTube coders doing calls to OpenAI's o1 model for some very simple classification tasks. That isn't the best tool for the job.

replies(10): >>42058980 #>>42059047 #>>42059100 #>>42059544 #>>42059813 #>>42060244 #>>42060447 #>>42060561 #>>42060833 #>>42062658 #
1. jensgk ◴[] No.42062658[source]
> I wonder what would have happened if we poured the same amount of money, talent and hardware into SVMs, random forests, KNN, etc.

From my perspective, that is actually what happened between the mid-90s to 2015. Neural netowrks were dead in that period, but any other ML method was very, very hot.