←back to thread

700 points yen223 | 3 comments | | HN request time: 0.001s | source
Show context
huskyr ◴[] No.42058651[source]
I've never heard of networkQuality, that's seems like quite a useful tool.
replies(2): >>42059750 #>>42061564 #
1. dmd ◴[] No.42061564[source]
Unfortunately, it's not actually very useful, as whatever server they're using on the other end is severely constrained. networkQuality gives me:

Downlink: 884.856 Mbps, 198 RPM - Uplink: 13.238 Mbps, 198 RPM

whereas speedtest (whether to the official speedtest server OR a friend's home server in their basement!) gives ~700 Mbps uplink.

replies(1): >>42065818 #
2. lladnar ◴[] No.42065818[source]
try

  networkQuality -s

That's a more apples to apples comparison to speedtest.net; Separate upload and download tests.
replies(1): >>42067035 #
3. dmd ◴[] No.42067035[source]
Somewhat better, 867/114, but still not the symmetric I get on typical real workloads.