←back to thread

499 points baal80spam | 1 comments | | HN request time: 0.247s | source
Show context
bloody-crow ◴[] No.42055016[source]
Surprising it took so long given how dominant the EPYC CPUs were for years.
replies(8): >>42055051 #>>42055064 #>>42055100 #>>42055513 #>>42055586 #>>42055837 #>>42055949 #>>42055960 #
1. topspin ◴[] No.42055586[source]
I don't agree that this is surprising. To be "dominant" in this space means more than raw performance or value. One must also dominate the details. It has taken AMD a long time to iron out a large number of these details, including drivers, firmware, chipsets and other matters, to reach real parity with Intel.

The good news is that AMD has, finally, mostly achieved that, and in some ways they are now superior. But that has taken time: far longer than it took AMD to beat Intel at benchmarks.