←back to thread

499 points baal80spam | 6 comments | | HN request time: 0.697s | source | bottom
Show context
gautamcgoel ◴[] No.42055008[source]
Damn, first Intel missed out on Mobile, then it fumbled AI, and now it's being seriously challenged on its home turf. Pat has his work cut out for him.
replies(6): >>42055079 #>>42055125 #>>42055190 #>>42055260 #>>42055329 #>>42057153 #
1. rafaelmn ◴[] No.42055190[source]
His work now boils down to prepping Intel for an acquisition.
replies(2): >>42055280 #>>42055745 #
2. Wytwwww ◴[] No.42055280[source]
By whom though? I don't see how any company directly competing with Intel (or even orthogonal e.g. Nvidia and ARM) could be allowed to by Intel (they'd need approval in the US/EU and presumably a few other places) unless it's actually on the brink of bankruptcy?
replies(1): >>42056331 #
3. saywhanow ◴[] No.42055745[source]
IIRC Intel and AMD have a patent sharing agreement that dissolves if either is purchased.
replies(2): >>42057654 #>>42060981 #
4. shiroiushi ◴[] No.42056331[source]
>unless it's actually on the brink of bankruptcy?

This may be in the cards.

5. rafaelmn ◴[] No.42057654[source]
That's just a thing that needs to be renegotiated - highly doubt these two are getting into a patent war given the state of x86. Unless Intel gets acquired by a litigious company to go after AMD :shrug:
6. tonyhart7 ◴[] No.42060981[source]
Gov would bail out intel or amd lol, this would negate American tech dominance and would try to prevent that