That nearly ruined Microsoft...
https://www.seattletimes.com/business/microsoft-ditches-syst...
That nearly ruined Microsoft...
https://www.seattletimes.com/business/microsoft-ditches-syst...
that doesn't mean it's easy to implement, manage, or impossible to game, or that it plays nice wrt human factors, but to attack the core idea as essentially wrong is anti math, science, and rationality.
Microsoft always suffered from rewarding egotists and political animals over people who did actual work.
All it does is make true talent not want to work with other true talent for fear they get screwed over.
no, it's not, you are wrong. It is based on the probability that you will not have all those outliers on one team, a probability that is very very high.
also, it's not used for teams of a dozen people where you can easily know everybody personally, it's used for teams of 1000 people, and Bill Gates, Mark Zuckerberg, Steve Jobs, Larry Ellison, Elon Musk, Satya Nadella, and Jeff Bezos 'S jobs would all be safe (if they could get along with each other, which they couldn't, there'd be so much backstabbing productivity would grind to a halt :)