←back to thread

371 points greggyb | 2 comments | | HN request time: 0.482s | source
Show context
codeflo ◴[] No.41977294[source]
I'm not informed enough to rebut this, and don't want to be quoted in the follow-up article that suggests HN is still too dumb to get the genius of Ballmer, but here's my take.

It's only the footnote of the article that mentions Ballmer's "stage persona". I think that's the important point, and I would add that his "interview persona" might have been even worse. Back then, he was quoted as saying insanely dumb shit all the time. Like when he literally publicly laughed about the iPhone. Or when he called a Zune feature to share files between devices "squirting".

Maybe he did make all kinds of brilliant decisions internally. I wouldn't know, but neither would the stock market. If the CEO comes across as not understanding tech, it's likely the market will price that in.

replies(2): >>41977313 #>>41978260 #
causality0 ◴[] No.41978260[source]
Brief data transmissions being called "squirts" is common, and was more common at the time.
replies(2): >>41978358 #>>41978810 #
kstrauser ◴[] No.41978810[source]
I've been involved with computer networking since approximately 1982, and I've never once heard someone use "squirts" outside talking about Zunes. I don't doubt that it was jargon inside very specific niches, but it has never been common elsewhere.
replies(1): >>41982831 #
1. agurk ◴[] No.41982831[source]
Before the Ballmer/Zune use of the term I remember my father talking about data being squirted to A2A missiles (he was military) prior to launch, so perhaps that is one of the niches.
replies(1): >>41984391 #
2. kstrauser ◴[] No.41984391[source]
I take that back. An old issue of Wired had a jargon watch mention of “squirt the bird” as bouncing something off a satellite, which I remembered only because they misspelled it and I wondered what “quirt” meant.

So yeah, maybe that’s a military or adjacent thing.