←back to thread

371 points greggyb | 1 comments | | HN request time: 0s | source
Show context
legitster ◴[] No.41977299[source]
Having spent some time at the Microsoft campus, I can tell you this is basically the consensus view from employees today. Ballmer was not a cool, trendy, or fun CEO who people rallied behind - but he more or less "got the job done". He was the captain of a massive ship with a turning radius the size of a continent guiding it through icebergs.

Azure's success was specifically set in motion under Ballmer. Owed to the fact that it was developed to Microsoft's strengths (enterprise support) that it didn't piss off too many of their partners and sales channels. Same with Office 365 and all of their other successful services. None are glamourous - but all are impressive with how not awful they are given their design constraints.

Even things like Surface, while considered a failure, did its intended job of getting hardware partners to get their act together and make better consumer products.

replies(7): >>41978220 #>>41978337 #>>41978547 #>>41978554 #>>41978721 #>>41978916 #>>41982882 #
dyauspitr ◴[] No.41978337[source]
Azure happened because of Nadella (who led the project) despite Ballmer.
replies(4): >>41978528 #>>41978558 #>>41978577 #>>42007740 #
dexterdog ◴[] No.41978558[source]
Azure may be successful financially, but as someone who has finally used it for the last two years after 15 years of AWS and a little bit of GCP, I can't help but think the world would be a better place if it didn't exist or if some lesser player had that market share.
replies(3): >>41978700 #>>41978813 #>>41978983 #
1. dyauspitr ◴[] No.41978983[source]
I disagree, I find Azure much easier to set up and use.