←back to thread

552 points freedomben | 1 comments | | HN request time: 0.208s | source
Show context
sho ◴[] No.41809962[source]
Hopefully this is the inflection point for Chrome. Despite all their made-up "security" reasons, everyone knows this is solely about making adblock less effective. For many users, adblock is what makes chrome bearable - and if they make it unbearable, then those users will leave. Slowly but surely.

Google seems much too sure of itself making this change. I hope their arrogance pays off just the same as Microsoft's did with IE.

replies(14): >>41810044 #>>41810118 #>>41810304 #>>41810320 #>>41810359 #>>41810375 #>>41810472 #>>41810519 #>>41810553 #>>41811938 #>>41812626 #>>41813079 #>>41813685 #>>41822203 #
kmlx ◴[] No.41810472[source]
> making adblock less effective

adblocking still works just fine on Safari, which has been doing the same thing as Manifest V3 for years now.

replies(1): >>41813069 #
timeon ◴[] No.41813069[source]
Ad-blockers are not just about displaying the actual ads.

Does the Chrome blocks trackers even without ad-blocker Like Safari?

replies(1): >>41944294 #
1. kmlx ◴[] No.41944294[source]
my adblocker on Safari blocks everything, including trackers. no idea about Chrome.