←back to thread

Learning to Learn

(kevin.the.li)
320 points jklm | 1 comments | | HN request time: 0.346s | source
Show context
zfnmxt ◴[] No.41911361[source]
Posts like this that talk about learning "efficiency" always come off as soulless and dystopian to me. I think learning should be fun and that fun learning is the most effective---that's the only thing I optimize for and I certainly don't think about efficiency percentages. What a drag that would be.
replies(8): >>41911370 #>>41911406 #>>41911551 #>>41911802 #>>41911854 #>>41912823 #>>41913260 #>>41914201 #
blackoil ◴[] No.41911802[source]
I would say "fun" is overrated. We have become so focused on everything being fun that everything including fun itself has become tepid and mediocre. It is important to slog through the hard parts to cross the barrier of expert beginner. We are over downplaying the value of hard work and grit.
replies(4): >>41912261 #>>41912870 #>>41913271 #>>41917547 #
zfnmxt ◴[] No.41912261[source]
In many ways I agree with your opening sentence---maybe I shouldn't have written "fun". I think I was trying to get at something more like that the experience of learning itself is itself a good thing (even if it's not fun, even if it's suffering, even if it's hard) and I think mechanical and stoic recipes to optimize the process fail to adequately appreciate that fact.

The best part of learning piano isn't getting good at piano---it's learning piano. And sure there are some things we have to learn that we aren't that interested in learning, but I think even those things have the capacity to be worthwhile experiences if properly framed.

I think applying the word "efficient" to this area is suggestive of urgency and greater purpose---I don't buy into either.

replies(2): >>41912522 #>>41928802 #
1. proper_elb ◴[] No.41928802[source]
I think 'joy' would be a fitting term, perhaps? Here (https://www.1517.org/articles/cs-lewis-on-joy) C.S.Lewis defines it well, and distinguishes it from 'pleasure' and 'happiness'.