←back to thread

115 points snvzz | 1 comments | | HN request time: 0.212s | source
Show context
VariousPrograms ◴[] No.41910406[source]
It's silly how privacy detractors try to associate so-and-so terrible group with any software that simply lets people talk without corporate or government surveillance, as if the concept of a private conversation is a strange and suspicious thing now.
replies(3): >>41910699 #>>41911421 #>>41915192 #
emodendroket ◴[] No.41911421[source]
I think in principle most people agree that it's appropriate under some limited circumstances for authorities to listen in to private conversations, given well-founded suspicion of illegal activities taking place, so digital tools making that outright impossible do pose a problem most people find a bit uncomfortable, whether or not they feel the benefits outweigh the downsides.
replies(8): >>41911707 #>>41911803 #>>41911945 #>>41912666 #>>41914188 #>>41914204 #>>41915512 #>>41918201 #
hulitu ◴[] No.41911803[source]
> I think in principle most people agree that it's appropriate under some limited circumstances for authorities to listen in to private conversations, given well-founded suspicion of illegal activities taking place,

You're right. You know where the most illegal activities take place ? In the parliament. Can we listen to the private conversations of our representatives ? /s

replies(1): >>41921586 #
1. emodendroket ◴[] No.41921586[source]
Ha ha ha. Would you like to say something more substantive?