←back to thread

Tog's Paradox

(www.votito.com)
260 points adzicg | 1 comments | | HN request time: 0.209s | source
Show context
nine_k ◴[] No.41914693[source]
It looks almost as if humans have a nearly infinite backlog of things they would do if they only had time and capability, and a limit on the amount of effort they are capable of exerting per day. Then, once new tools increase their productivity and free up a bit of resources, they pick more desiderata from the backlog, and try to also accomplish that. Naturally they seek more tools for the newly-possible activities, and the loop closes.

This applies to any activity, leisure emphatically included. Travel became simpler → more vacations now involve flying a plane and thus obtaining tickets online and thus comparison-shopping, aggregating reviews of faraway places, etc → omg, vacation travel is complex again. It just allows to fulfill more of a dream.

replies(6): >>41914766 #>>41915028 #>>41916743 #>>41918405 #>>41918416 #>>41923350 #
delichon ◴[] No.41914766[source]
The nearly infinite backlog also means that there is nearly infinite demand for labor and Luddite adjacent arguments that labor saving technology causes persistent underemployment are invalid.
replies(3): >>41914865 #>>41914903 #>>41914935 #
Epa095 ◴[] No.41914903[source]
Friendly reminder that things ended up quite shit for the actuall ludites, and the advantages only 'trickled down' after a generation or two. So I will keep being worried for everyone who works now, and their kids.
replies(3): >>41915071 #>>41915104 #>>41921138 #
1. bluGill ◴[] No.41921138[source]
The ludlites needed to learn new jobs. I know many old people who are unwilling to try anything new. I try to not be one, but sometimes I've already seen that in some different form - I'm not sure if I'm right to be cynical about new things or not.