←back to thread

72 points jakey_bakey | 1 comments | | HN request time: 0s | source
Show context
xxxtemp ◴[] No.41916935[source]
I feel crazy sometimes, because I'm the exact opposite. WFH has been a disaster for me. I just joined a team with a hybrid schedule (3 days in the office). I'm there every day, but it's pretty dead on the other 2 days. If they close the office and go remote-only I will quit on the spot.
replies(8): >>41916953 #>>41916965 #>>41916986 #>>41916987 #>>41917022 #>>41917107 #>>41917185 #>>41917352 #
codr7 ◴[] No.41916965[source]
Having the option is the point, people are different.
replies(2): >>41917025 #>>41917085 #
xxxtemp ◴[] No.41917025[source]
I get that point of view, but for me, being alone in an empty office isn't much better than being alone at home. I'm not trying to force people to be in the office, I just want to find a team where people WANT to be there. It seems very hard to find, but it's also hard to believe I'm the only one in the world who wants to be part of something like that.
replies(7): >>41917053 #>>41917124 #>>41917147 #>>41917252 #>>41917315 #>>41917515 #>>41918584 #
rachofsunshine ◴[] No.41917315[source]
You aren't alone, although you're in the minority. In our data set, around 9% of candidates are looking for in-office work only (we find a similar value to the OP - 41% - looking for remote work only).

That's an advantage for you, though! Active desire to work in-office greatly reduces the amount of competition you're dealing with for jobs; all else equal, it should ~double your success rate.

replies(1): >>41920771 #
1. johnnyanmac ◴[] No.41920771[source]
Double of "no one is hiring" is "no one is hiring", sadly. My experience with hybrid/in-office hasn't been much better WFH. I wonder if Los Angeles is being hit even harder than most of the country for some reason.