←back to thread

280 points antidnan | 6 comments | | HN request time: 0.014s | source | bottom
Show context
flenserboy ◴[] No.41917967[source]
Interesting, & not necessarily in a good way. This method could well presage unprecedented numbers of attempts at eminent domain takings or other means of forcing people out of their properties.
replies(2): >>41917991 #>>41918336 #
richwater ◴[] No.41917991[source]
National security (by identifying and processing rare earth metals and materials domestically) is vastly more important to society than a few dozen homes somewhere.
replies(3): >>41918037 #>>41918208 #>>41918353 #
1. ifdefdebug ◴[] No.41918037[source]
sure. just make sure to pay them what their land is worth... with the lithium below.
replies(2): >>41918052 #>>41918057 #
2. jumploops ◴[] No.41918052[source]
Do most residential land parcels include mining rights?
replies(2): >>41918089 #>>41920065 #
3. ct0 ◴[] No.41918057[source]
Is there case law on how deep land goes? I could imagine that there will be in the near future.
replies(1): >>41918090 #
4. chx ◴[] No.41918089[source]
https://www.nolo.com/legal-encyclopedia/who-owns-the-mineral...

> Mineral rights are automatically included as a part of the land in a property conveyance, unless and until the ownership gets separated at some point by an owner/seller.

> Since sellers of land can convey only property that they own, each sale of the land after the minerals are separated automatically includes only the land. Deeds to the land made after the first separation of the minerals will not refer to the fact that the mineral rights are not included.

> in most cases, you cannot determine whether you own the rights to the minerals under your land just by looking at your deed. Owners are sometimes surprised to find out someone else owns the rights to the minerals under their land

> U.S. laws regulating mining and mineral rights typically prohibit mineral owners from damaging or interfering with the use of any homes or other improvements on the land when extracting minerals. As a result, mineral owners do not typically attempt mineral extraction in highly populated areas. This means that if you live in a city, or an area with many houses on small plots of land, you probably won't need to worry about whether or not you own any minerals that might be under you

5. engineer_22 ◴[] No.41918090[source]
Yes, mineral rights are well defined in US real property law.
6. lesuorac ◴[] No.41920065[source]
idk, but if you're going to buy a house check if it's "Fee Simple" which does include mineral rights.

https://www.rangerminerals.com/what-does-fee-simple-estate-o...