←back to thread

USGS uses machine learning to show large lithium potential in Arkansas

(www.usgs.gov)
282 points antidnan | 1 comments | 22 Oct 24 17:05 UTC | HN request time: 0s | source
Show context
chromatin ◴[22 Oct 24 17:30 UTC] No.41916576[source]▶
Serious question:

Given the mood alerting properties of lithium, are people living here chiller than would be expected (controlling for instance for poverty / SES) ?

replies(8): >>41916615 #>>41916687 #>>41916836 #>>41916871 #>>41916981 #>>41917788 #>>41918614 #>>41919801 #
janice1999 ◴[22 Oct 24 18:08 UTC] No.41916981[source]▶
Potentially. See "Lithium in drinking water linked with lower suicide rates" [1].

[1] https://www.kcl.ac.uk/news/lithium-in-drinking-water-linked-...

replies(2): >>41917239 #>>41917971 #
thesuitonym ◴[22 Oct 24 18:31 UTC] No.41917239[source]▶
I would assume any positive effects are balanced out by living in Arkansas.
replies(3): >>41917262 #>>41917330 #>>41917531 #
snakeyjake ◴[22 Oct 24 19:02 UTC] No.41917531[source]▶
People downvoted you to the point that your comment is grayed out and about to be hidden but there is hardly metric by which Arkansas is not in the bottom ten on a list of states.

Infant mortality rate? 3rd most deadly for babies.

Poverty rate? 7th poorest.

Homicide rate? 7th most dangerous.

Obesity rate? 3rd fattest.

Practically any map of any measurable statistic where states are colored red for "bad" and green for "good" Arkansas will be a deep, blood, red.

But it is rude to point that out.

replies(4): >>41917646 #>>41917703 #>>41917816 #>>41917841 #
1. rootusrootus ◴[22 Oct 24 19:20 UTC] No.41917703[source]▶
> But it is rude to point that out.

No, that is not rude at all. Making a flippant derogatory remark gets downvotes, people like to see numbers. Like the ones you just gave...