←back to thread

613 points indus | 3 comments | | HN request time: 1.072s | source
1. nottorp ◴[] No.41917672[source]
So... wasn't this fraud even before and thus covered in some penal code section?
replies(1): >>41917833 #
2. bombcar ◴[] No.41917833[source]
There’s a line between fraud and first they’re trying to navigate. Suppressing speech in the USA is notoriously hard, but can be done if targeted narrowly enough.
replies(1): >>41923053 #
3. alok-g ◴[] No.41923053[source]
Thanks. Now I understand the significance of the ruling better. Love this.

I am in general interested in seeing free speech being replaced by truthful or well-intentioned speech. Fact-checking is hard, and GenAI is making this worse. In my opinion, it is time to reevaluate the notion of free speech.