←back to thread

238 points solcloud | 6 comments | | HN request time: 0s | source | bottom
Show context
josephcsible ◴[] No.41916141[source]
Can you add a license file?
replies(1): >>41916703 #
solcloud ◴[] No.41916703[source]
I guess I can, but I am not a lawyer and I don't really want to go on date with Gaben and his lawyers (date with Gabe, gooseman and Jess is ok for me), but if you have any suggestions please share
replies(4): >>41916709 #>>41916908 #>>41917805 #>>41918333 #
solcloud ◴[] No.41916709[source]
source code is all written from scratch and it is free for anybody
replies(3): >>41916909 #>>41917062 #>>41917184 #
kurisufag ◴[] No.41917184[source]
this may be what you're looking for

http://www.wtfpl.net/about/

replies(1): >>41917625 #
1. wyldfire ◴[] No.41917625{3}[source]
Don't use that license, use something similar like MIT, BSD or Apache instead.
replies(2): >>41917987 #>>41918264 #
2. kurisufag ◴[] No.41917987[source]
would you mind pointing out why?

those are very dissimilar licenses in the sense that wtfpl is basically a cute way of putting something into the public domain, while MIT et. al. do actually have (albeit minor and reasonable) restrictions on the conduct of people using the code.

replies(2): >>41918662 #>>41919459 #
3. dokyun ◴[] No.41918264[source]
WTFPL is a fine license. It's even FSF approved.
replies(1): >>41918502 #
4. josephcsible ◴[] No.41918502[source]
The FSF certifies that it's a free software license that's compatible with the GPL, but they recommend against using it: https://www.gnu.org/licenses/license-list.en.html#WTFPL
5. poizan42 ◴[] No.41918662[source]
There is no disclaimer of liability and implied warranty. You may be on the hook for damages if someone uses your code under the WTFPL and there is a bug that causes them to lose money.
6. leni536 ◴[] No.41919459[source]
You can use zero-clause BSD[1] or MIT no-attribution[2].

[1] https://opensource.org/license/0bsd

[2] https://opensource.org/license/mit-0