←back to thread

85 points lemper | 1 comments | | HN request time: 0.204s | source
Show context
redbell ◴[] No.41915253[source]
I often use the analogy "1+1=?" in debates with both friends and strangers, especially when discussing subjective topics like politics, religion, and geopolitical conflicts. It's a simple way to highlight how different perspectives can lead to vastly different conclusions.

For instance, I frequently use the example "1+1=10" in binary to illustrate that, while our reasoning may seem fundamentally different, it's simply because we're starting from different premises, using distinct methods, and approaching the same problem from unique angles.

replies(2): >>41915498 #>>41915600 #
hks0 ◴[] No.41915600[source]
> It's a simple way to highlight how different perspectives can lead to vastly different conclusions.

But 1+1=10 and 1+1=2 are not different conclusions, they are precisely the same conclusions but with different representations.

A better example might be 9 vs 6 written on the parking floor: depending on where you're standing, you'll read the number differently (and yet one of the readings is wrong).

replies(1): >>41916388 #
tmtvl ◴[] No.41916388[source]
> (and yet one of the readings is wrong).

It may not even be a number which is written, but the hiragana の (no).

replies(1): >>41917298 #
1. earthboundkid ◴[] No.41917298[source]
It could be Japanese beeper slang and mean Q.