←back to thread

376 points indus | 1 comments | | HN request time: 0s | source
Show context
binarymax ◴[] No.41915815[source]
Don’t worry, a judge in Texas in the pocket of some big company will shoot this down, just like the attempt to abolish non-competes
replies(1): >>41916027 #
renegade-otter[dead post] ◴[] No.41916027[source]
[flagged]
stronglikedan ◴[] No.41916314[source]
> the SCOTUS judges are the de facto experts of all matters and the regulators

And thankfully so.

replies(1): >>41916899 #
kccoder ◴[] No.41916899[source]
Curious why you think these nine individuals are better suited than people with actual expertise?

In the ruling in which they self-ordained these new powers, Gorsuch confused nitrous oxide with nitrogen oxide, five times. Better hope Gorsuch didn't rule on dental anesthetics on your next visit to the dentist.

https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/the-supreme-court...

replies(2): >>41917018 #>>41917491 #
1. consumer451 ◴[] No.41917018[source]
Especially since one of the main arguments I have heard from folks who approve of the ruling is "but these agency people are un-elected officials!" So are Supreme Court Justices, who unlike agency people have no ethics rules.