←back to thread

205 points bsoles | 1 comments | | HN request time: 0.204s | source
Show context
tptacek ◴[] No.41908836[source]
SWEBOK 4 adds a dedicated section for security, but it's painfully 2012 (testing, for instance, centers on the old industry-driven "SAST" vs. "DAST" distinction). It also promotes stuff like Common Criteria and CVSS. The "domain-specific" security section could have been pulled out of the OWASP wiki from 2012 as well: "cloud", "IOT", "machine learning".
replies(3): >>41910272 #>>41911429 #>>41930898 #
mixmastamyk ◴[] No.41911429[source]
Believe it is supposed to be slow-moving, keeping to settled matters. Have those fallen out of favor, or shown to be wrong already?
replies(1): >>41916609 #
1. tptacek ◴[] No.41916609[source]
I would not describe SWEBOK's breakdown of software security as "settled".