←back to thread

319 points rcarmo | 2 comments | | HN request time: 0.483s | source
Show context
giardini[dead post] ◴[] No.41916472[source]
[flagged]
1. riotnrrd ◴[] No.41916558[source]
In your rush to condemn it, did you actually read the linked article? Let me quote:

"These tests [...] were “supposedly applicable to both white and black prospective voters who couldn’t prove a certain level of education” (typically up to the fifth grade). Yet they were “in actuality disproportionately administered to black voters.”

Additionally, many of the tests were rigged so that registrars could give potential voters an easy or a difficult version, and could score them differently as well. For example, the Veterans of the Civil Rights Movement describes a test administered in Alabama that is so entirely subjective that it measures the registrar’s shrewdness and cunning more than anything else."

replies(1): >>41917110 #
2. llamaimperative ◴[] No.41917110[source]
The bad news is this "enlightened racism apologist" trend seems to be on the uptick. The good news is that they're so unfathomably ignorant of basic historical facts (as you demonstrate) that it's easy to prove they're actually mere average-intelligence racism apologists.