←back to thread

376 points indus | 1 comments | | HN request time: 0.212s | source
Show context
mmooss ◴[] No.41915635[source]
> the rule bans reviews and testimonials attributed to people who don’t exist or are generated by artificial intelligence, people who don’t have experience with the business or product/services, or misrepresent their experience.

Does the rule apply to private citizens? I wonder if the First Amendment agrees with penalizing private citizens "who don’t have experience with the business or product/services, or misrepresent their experience". They may mean that businesses can't engage people to write such reviews.

Also, how will they handle the scale of enforcement? The large companies seem easy - one enforcement action covers all of Yelp, another all of Amazon, etc. But what about the infinite reviews at smaller vendoers?

Overall though, I think this is great and long past due. The lawlessness of the Internet - fraud, spying, etc. - is absurd.

replies(7): >>41915659 #>>41915747 #>>41916375 #>>41917654 #>>41917762 #>>41919091 #>>41919383 #
dataflow ◴[] No.41915747[source]
> Does the rule apply to private citizens? I wonder if the First Amendment agrees with penalizing private citizens "who don’t have experience with the business or product/services, or misrepresent their experience".

I'm sure someone will try to argue that, but the way I interpreted it is that this is not banning people from sharing fake reviews, it's banning businesses from publishing and misrepresenting those reviews as genuine. i.e. It's regulating the business's practices, not the (purported) consumers'.

replies(1): >>41916170 #
1. 8note ◴[] No.41916170[source]
Effectively, I think it still bans joke reviews. You can submit a joke review, but the company cannot publish it