←back to thread

246 points nh2 | 1 comments | | HN request time: 0s | source
Show context
billpg ◴[] No.41912612[source]
Is "name constraints" new? I wanted to do something similar a decade or two ago and found I'd have to be trusted for all domains, which I wanted to avoid.
replies(2): >>41912756 #>>41915972 #
1. toast0 ◴[] No.41915972[source]
A decade ago, name constraints was available, but support wasn't really there. I was looking into making a company CA for internal tools, but I didn't want to be able to MITM employees going to unrelated sites, and I couldn't mandate specific browsers, so we ended up using a commercial CA for everything.

It looks like support is fairly wide now, but you'd probably still need to test and confirm it works with all the tools you want, and there's still some risk to users in case the constraints don't catch everything.