←back to thread

First images from Euclid are in

(dlmultimedia.esa.int)
1413 points mooreds | 4 comments | | HN request time: 0.848s | source
Show context
Jun8 ◴[] No.41910854[source]
Watching this is ... hard to find the words to describe it. It's insane!

It shows us how mind bogglingly vast the universe is and how we're literally nothing compared to it. Paradoxically, it also makes me feel incredibly potent and capable as a human being in that being this small we can know so much!

Your size is to the distance of that distant spiral galaxy (420 Mly - 10e24m) as a neutrino is to you (effective cross section of a 1MeV neutron = 10e-24m: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Orders_of_magnitude_(length))

replies(4): >>41911030 #>>41911331 #>>41911402 #>>41913178 #
kranner ◴[] No.41911402[source]
That we can know anything at all is a miracle in itself. It could have been just fine evolutionarily for us Earth creatures to be no more than Large Action Models with no inner experience, but somehow we ended up as these perceiving, cogitating, apprehending beings.
replies(3): >>41912322 #>>41912458 #>>41914387 #
1. bbor ◴[] No.41914387[source]
How could you possibly be an affective agent without knowledge? And how could anything ever use knowledge without perceiving it? Whenever anyone talks about philosophical zombies, I say “show me one, then” — until then I’m sticking with (what I see as) the scientific consensus, which is that we’re material like literally everything else is in the Actual, perceivable world.

What would it be like to not be like anything?

replies(1): >>41915759 #
2. kranner ◴[] No.41915759[source]
I'm also a materialist, and the lack of p-zombies here cannot preclude their existence elsewhere.
replies(1): >>41921405 #
3. bbor ◴[] No.41921405[source]
How would you know one when you saw it, though? What is a p-zombie, if you’re not allowed to use any synonyms for “soul”?
replies(1): >>41942514 #
4. kbelder ◴[] No.41942514{3}[source]
The concept of p-zombies requires a soul, or other mystic forces. It just hides it. Materialists should reject the notion as inherently incoherent. Two things cannot be physically the same, where one is conscious and the other not. To think so, is to invalidate physics.