←back to thread

115 points snvzz | 1 comments | | HN request time: 0.207s | source
Show context
VariousPrograms ◴[] No.41910406[source]
It's silly how privacy detractors try to associate so-and-so terrible group with any software that simply lets people talk without corporate or government surveillance, as if the concept of a private conversation is a strange and suspicious thing now.
replies(3): >>41910699 #>>41911421 #>>41915192 #
emodendroket ◴[] No.41911421[source]
I think in principle most people agree that it's appropriate under some limited circumstances for authorities to listen in to private conversations, given well-founded suspicion of illegal activities taking place, so digital tools making that outright impossible do pose a problem most people find a bit uncomfortable, whether or not they feel the benefits outweigh the downsides.
replies(8): >>41911707 #>>41911803 #>>41911945 #>>41912666 #>>41914188 #>>41914204 #>>41915512 #>>41918201 #
1. barryrandall ◴[] No.41914188[source]
The problem is that there's no effective way to enforce those limits without compromising everyone's privacy. It simply is not possible to have privacy and any amount of eavesdropping.