←back to thread

145 points ignoramous | 1 comments | | HN request time: 0s | source
Show context
kcorbitt ◴[] No.41911422[source]
I saw this when it was making the rounds on X a few days ago. Fair warning: it seems like at least some sections are AI-generated, and there isn't much insight to be gained from reading the actual sections compared to eg. reading the relevant category pages on Huggingface.
replies(4): >>41911596 #>>41911605 #>>41912253 #>>41912270 #
worstspotgain ◴[] No.41912253[source]
Glancing at the authors' names, it's possible that none of them are native English speakers. Any chance that the sections you're referring to were just AI-polished rather than AI-generated?
replies(1): >>41912649 #
qeternity ◴[] No.41912649[source]
No, this paper was edited yesterday. The original (you can verify on arxiv) contained this incredible section: "6.10 Optimised Routing and Pruning Operations (ORPO)"

The actual ORPO paper is "Odds Ratio Preference Optimisation" and it has nothing to do with pruning. This goes way beyond native language preference.

replies(2): >>41913061 #>>41913443 #
1. cubefox ◴[] No.41913061[source]
Wow, so significant parts of the paper could still be LLM confabulation.