←back to thread

34 points codewiz | 6 comments | | HN request time: 1.182s | source | bottom
1. ptek ◴[] No.41913028[source]
If you want to play that game or the darknets game you may need to keep changing your alias which could be a problem as you will have to start from 0 again growing contacts and respect.

Do new groups and users have kick ass ASCII logos in their t-files these days? I’m glad the 90s era of incorrect capitalisation is gone.

replies(2): >>41913122 #>>41913206 #
2. thelittleone ◴[] No.41913122[source]
Sam Bent gave a talk on Darknet opsec in which he recommends what you suggest, regularly changing alias and starting from 0. Quite an interesting talk.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=01oeaBb85Xc

3. dmichulke ◴[] No.41913206[source]
You could publish a key as each of these personas and then, when reestablishing a contact using a new persona, prove your identity to that one contact by using the private key of the old (known) persona.

Am I missing something?

replies(1): >>41913398 #
4. str3wer ◴[] No.41913398[source]
defeats the whole point of changing identity if you reveal who you were
replies(1): >>41914003 #
5. dmichulke ◴[] No.41914003{3}[source]
You reveal it to a single (trustworthy) party that you want to reestablish contact with.

Of course, this assumes you wouldn't want to reestablish contact with a non-trustworthy party.

replies(1): >>41914043 #
6. barryrandall ◴[] No.41914043{4}[source]
A trail of evidence is still a trail of evidence.