←back to thread

180 points beryilma | 1 comments | | HN request time: 0s | source
Show context
epolanski ◴[] No.41909746[source]
After seeing so much negativity and controversy around this book in the comments, I'm quite convinced to giving it a read.

I've seen so little "engineering" in software world, regardless of the company and how many ivy league devs it hires to be fully convinced that a work of encoding software engineering knowledge is worth the effort, and even attempts like this are valuable reads in such a gigantic vacuum, even just to start a discussion and to be able to disagree on definitions and practices.

replies(2): >>41910029 #>>41910170 #
rockemsockem ◴[] No.41910170[source]
I love the notion of having standard definitions and practices that are specifically not agreed on and will be argued about every time they come up.
replies(1): >>41912801 #
1. epolanski ◴[] No.41912801[source]
To move forward you need a starting place.