←back to thread

95 points thunderbong | 1 comments | | HN request time: 0.204s | source
Show context
java-man ◴[] No.41911233[source]
Firefox is using TripleDES??
replies(3): >>41911581 #>>41911662 #>>41911814 #
hulitu ◴[] No.41911581[source]
> Firefox is using TripleDES??

What's wrong with it ? /s

replies(1): >>41911639 #
penguin359 ◴[] No.41911639[source]
I would mostly say that it's just slow and AES is a much more modern and faster (partly due to hardware acceleration built into modern chips) that is already built info Firefox to support TLS anyways. There are some known attacks against 3DES now, but nothing that completely breaks it yet. And, since this is just for local storage, primarily, it shouldn't be as vulnerable as using 3DES for TLS channel encryption.
replies(2): >>41911660 #>>41912047 #
1. wtallis ◴[] No.41912047[source]
For a password manager, whether a cipher is fast or slow could mean something entirely different than for something that has to encrypt and decrypt large amounts of data. Cycles per byte is probably completely irrelevant here and I'd expect performance to basically be a function of how many cache misses (both data and code) are incurred to decrypt a single password.