←back to thread

95 points thunderbong | 1 comments | | HN request time: 0.247s | source
Show context
java-man ◴[] No.41911233[source]
Firefox is using TripleDES??
replies(3): >>41911581 #>>41911662 #>>41911814 #
hulitu ◴[] No.41911581[source]
> Firefox is using TripleDES??

What's wrong with it ? /s

replies(1): >>41911639 #
penguin359 ◴[] No.41911639[source]
I would mostly say that it's just slow and AES is a much more modern and faster (partly due to hardware acceleration built into modern chips) that is already built info Firefox to support TLS anyways. There are some known attacks against 3DES now, but nothing that completely breaks it yet. And, since this is just for local storage, primarily, it shouldn't be as vulnerable as using 3DES for TLS channel encryption.
replies(2): >>41911660 #>>41912047 #
N-Krause ◴[] No.41911660[source]
Thanks, even tho the comment above signaled sarcasm, the explanation was helpful for me, as I really had no idea what 3DES means and why it could be problematic.
replies(1): >>41911682 #
Dalewyn ◴[] No.41911682[source]
I shudder to think that even a simple Google query leading to a Wikipedia article was too much effort here...

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Triple_DES

replies(2): >>41911722 #>>41912507 #
bbarnett ◴[] No.41911722[source]
Any "simple" Google query now means pages of nonsense answers, promoted sites, AI "help", before you even get to a cogent result.

Much better to just talk to others than use Google.

replies(4): >>41911743 #>>41911809 #>>41911817 #>>41912948 #
1. Scoundreller ◴[] No.41911743[source]
Reddit, got it.

and Google and quora are in cahoots, right?