←back to thread

285 points alephnerd | 1 comments | | HN request time: 0s | source
Show context
neya ◴[] No.41901576[source]
If you use Azure in any realistic production environments, then it's on you. Even with $100k in free credits, they couldn't convince me to use it for more than a month. It is expensive, the interface is highly user unfriendly and most important of all, their products don't at all seem reliable for production workloads because of stuff like this. Sorry Microsoft, I think you can do much better.
replies(15): >>41901755 #>>41902286 #>>41902571 #>>41902679 #>>41902715 #>>41903167 #>>41903320 #>>41903580 #>>41903869 #>>41904371 #>>41904976 #>>41905535 #>>41905826 #>>41905858 #>>41907485 #
BodyCulture ◴[] No.41901755[source]
I was laughing recently when at some place they started to install MS software on all Linux machines to integrate them into Azure. At that point you should just stop and think for a while about it. Didn’t you go for Linux because you wanted to have a reliable system?
replies(1): >>41902267 #
ratg13 ◴[] No.41902267[source]
The MS security software (for better or worse), is better than any open-source linux solution, and can follow attackers as they move laterally through the network, instead of linux servers being a big black hole were adversaries can do as they please.

All security software from any vendor is going to have issues, and often you just have to go with whatever the company is running for the whole environment and not compromising security because of some jokes from the 90s

replies(9): >>41902295 #>>41902467 #>>41902535 #>>41903119 #>>41903242 #>>41903448 #>>41903573 #>>41903949 #>>41911336 #
1. neya ◴[] No.41911336[source]
> The MS security software (for better or worse), is better than any open-source linux solution

[citation needed]