←back to thread

47 points todsacerdoti | 1 comments | | HN request time: 0.213s | source
1. kelnos ◴[] No.41910509[source]
I would have appreciated the rationale behind setting 'UsePAM' to 'no'. I assume it's because, with password auth disabled, it's not necessary, and better to disable something that you don't need that would otherwise add to the attack surface?