Most active commenters
  • cushpush(4)
  • nl(3)

←back to thread

226 points beedeebeedee | 11 comments | | HN request time: 1.426s | source | bottom
1. nl ◴[] No.41909627[source]
The story that was going around on social media (which I only know because Claude refused to translate it sometimes) was that a particular developer was modifying weights in other developers models and crashing their training runs so that the developers own work looked better in comparison.

https://twitter.com/YouJiacheng/status/1847420973580243092

replies(3): >>41913447 #>>41913453 #>>41915065 #
2. cushpush ◴[] No.41913447[source]
how is this any different from starting new projects at google and leaving them in a half-baked state because that leads to a promotion faster? incentives align behavior
replies(2): >>41913549 #>>41936008 #
3. cushpush ◴[] No.41913453[source]
"if i can't have agi no one can"
4. nl ◴[] No.41913549[source]
If you really can't see how that is different I don't know what to say.
replies(2): >>41914327 #>>41936062 #
5. ◴[] No.41914327{3}[source]
6. gradientsrneat ◴[] No.41915065[source]
How is Claude refusing to translate it significant? Ex: did it help you find the post?
replies(1): >>41920925 #
7. nl ◴[] No.41920925[source]
Jeremy Howard posted a link about it refusing to translate
8. iwontberude ◴[] No.41936008[source]
Plausible deniability?
9. cushpush ◴[] No.41936062{3}[source]
rhetorical questions are not questions
replies(1): >>41939174 #
10. throwaway314155 ◴[] No.41939174{4}[source]
Maybe don't post stupid comments if you don't want people to point out that they're stupid?

^ You can't respond to this btw. It's rhetorical.

^^ Yes, that was sarcasm.

replies(1): >>41939191 #
11. cushpush ◴[] No.41939191{5}[source]
I didn't mean to suggest "don't reply" -- I did want to start a conversation on how they are more or less the same thing. I guess I wasn't asking for clarity, right, I just wanted to point out that they're similar.