←back to thread

Please do not write below the line

(www.bbctvlicence.com)
313 points dcminter | 9 comments | 21 Oct 24 18:42 UTC | HN request time: 0.901s | source | bottom
Show context
cooper_ganglia ◴[21 Oct 24 19:34 UTC] No.41907633[source]▶
A "TV License" is one of those things I alway assumed people were making up to satirize the claims of over-regulation & bureaucracy in the UK.

Finding out it was real was a mixture of hilarious and sobering.

replies(19): >>41907663 #>>41907684 #>>41907721 #>>41907726 #>>41907766 #>>41907792 #>>41907811 #>>41907864 #>>41907881 #>>41907917 #>>41908104 #>>41908142 #>>41908609 #>>41908757 #>>41908807 #>>41909327 #>>41909601 #>>41909804 #>>41911273 #
lifeisstillgood ◴[21 Oct 24 20:20 UTC] No.41908142[source]▶
The BBC is prized in the UK, and rightly so. Most national broadcasters have strong public interest provisions but the Beeb has a history and culture of strong independent journalism, incredible childrens and family output and acts as a mainstay anchor to support a creative industry.

There is plenty to criticise but the weird ring fenced tax that we pay is incredible value for money (films, tv, web, journalism for the price of Netflix

replies(4): >>41908692 #>>41908928 #>>41909167 #>>41910566 #
1. colonwqbang ◴[21 Oct 24 22:20 UTC] No.41909167[source]▶
I appreciate state TV content and watch it regularly. But this argument just doesn't hold water. The service is so wonderful that they had to make it a criminal offence not to be a subscriber? And surely an "independent" TV station would have to be one which is not completely controlled by the state.
replies(3): >>41909479 #>>41909519 #>>41909522 #
2. lifeisstillgood ◴[21 Oct 24 23:05 UTC] No.41909479[source]▶
The bbc has been in a state of cost cutting as the Tory government of past 15 years has consistently throttled the licence fee as “punishment” for not being state controlled enough (ie Tory’s feel the BBC is biased against them

This is unlikely - partly any news media is biased against government as they do the actual decisions, but mostly the BBC is middle class britain incarnate, whereas the tories represent - well whatever the right wing is becoming these days.

As for licence fee - it’s basically a historical accident that became a ring fenced tax. Governments have strong views about people not paying taxes.

3. ◴[21 Oct 24 23:10 UTC] No.41909519[source]▶
4. renjimen ◴[21 Oct 24 23:11 UTC] No.41909522[source]▶
It's only an offense if you watch live TV [1]. They could have just lumped it in with your taxes, like they do in many other countries with state TV, but this approach in theory lets you opt out, even if they like to check up on you all too regularly. I suppose one downside of the BBC approach is tax is usually proportional to your income, while the TV license fee is not, and in fact you need to pay it even if you have no income. We had great games of hiding our TV in the closet as students whenever the license people came down the street.

[1] https://www.tvlicensing.co.uk/check-if-you-need-one/topics/t...

replies(2): >>41910119 #>>41910775 #
5. hypeatei ◴[22 Oct 24 00:50 UTC] No.41910119[source]▶
> hiding our TV in the closet as students whenever the license people came down the street

There are people going door-to-door to check TV licenses? Are they cops, what kind of power do they have? Seems extremely annoying and dystopian.

replies(1): >>41911491 #
6. cardiffspaceman ◴[22 Oct 24 02:57 UTC] No.41910775[source]▶
What happened to the vans with antennae that scanned for operating TVs (there’s an IF oscillator in there I guess) to find unlicensed receivers?
replies(1): >>41911211 #
7. mr_toad ◴[22 Oct 24 04:31 UTC] No.41911211{3}[source]▶
The BBC has never offered any proof or explanation of how they worked, and there is some suspicion that they are fakes used for their psychological effect.
replies(1): >>41911974 #
8. ◴[22 Oct 24 05:36 UTC] No.41911491{3}[source]▶
9. hoseja ◴[22 Oct 24 07:20 UTC] No.41911974{4}[source]▶
You can absolutely listen for the TV heterodyne leakage.