←back to thread

174 points nicosalm | 1 comments | | HN request time: 0s | source
Show context
alkh ◴[] No.41907921[source]
I swear to God that all of these CS labs at different unis look the same. I am getting flashbacks of labs in Toronto that looked exactly like pictures in the post
replies(3): >>41908068 #>>41909767 #>>41915016 #
whimsicalism ◴[] No.41908068[source]
even the physics labs i worked in looked like this
replies(1): >>41908590 #
chaboud ◴[] No.41908590[source]
The physics computer lab in Chamberlin Hall at UW in the 90's was a secret treasure trove of idle NeXTstation Turbo machines in an almost always empty room cooled to near refrigeration temperatures. I used to light up at least half of that room to run distributed simulations. There's probably still a 30 year old key to that lab in a junk drawer somewhere.

Eventually I realized that it just made sense to suck it up and get my own hardware, as it was either going to be esoteric "workstation" hardware with a fifth of the horsepower of a Pentium 75 or it was going to be in a room like the UPL jammed with CRT's and the smell of warm Josta.

How do students operate these days? Unless one is interacting with hardware, I'd be very tempted to stay in "fits on a laptop" space or slide to "screw it, cloud instances" scale. Anyone with contact in the last 5 years have a sense of how labs are being used now?

replies(5): >>41908630 #>>41909129 #>>41909137 #>>41909166 #>>41909593 #
1. alkh ◴[] No.41909129[source]
In my university you could technically use any computer but must ensure that your code would work/compile on lab PCs cause that's where TAs would check it. As a result, during labs most people would just use computers there(too much hassle otherwise)