(spacenews.com)

157 points milgrim | 1 comments | 21 Oct 24 14:09 UTC | HN request time: 0.192s | source

Show context

stavros ◴[21 Oct 24 16:56 UTC] No.41906039[source]▶

>>41904346 (OP) #

> “believe it is unlikely that the satellite will be recoverable.”

Why do these announcements have to be so hedgy? The satellite is in twenty pieces, I'd think that with the probability of spontaneous reconstruction being so low, we're fairly safe to say "will not be recoverable".

replies(2): >>41906388 #>>41908550 #

1. barryrandall ◴[21 Oct 24 21:09 UTC] No.41908550[source]▶

>>41906039 #

Because it was posted on the internet, where new and exciting forms of pedantry are invented every day.

↑

Intelsat 33e breaks up in geostationary orbit