←back to thread

Please do not write below the line

(www.bbctvlicence.com)
313 points dcminter | 1 comments | 21 Oct 24 18:42 UTC | HN request time: 0s | source
Show context
cooper_ganglia ◴[21 Oct 24 19:34 UTC] No.41907633[source]▶
A "TV License" is one of those things I alway assumed people were making up to satirize the claims of over-regulation & bureaucracy in the UK.

Finding out it was real was a mixture of hilarious and sobering.

replies(19): >>41907663 #>>41907684 #>>41907721 #>>41907726 #>>41907766 #>>41907792 #>>41907811 #>>41907864 #>>41907881 #>>41907917 #>>41908104 #>>41908142 #>>41908609 #>>41908757 #>>41908807 #>>41909327 #>>41909601 #>>41909804 #>>41911273 #
Zak ◴[21 Oct 24 19:38 UTC] No.41907684[source]▶
Many European countries are worse about it than the UK; even people who do not own a television are required by law to pay.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Television_licence

replies(9): >>41907763 #>>41907863 #>>41907865 #>>41907867 #>>41907970 #>>41907989 #>>41908308 #>>41909072 #>>41909254 #
Retr0id ◴[21 Oct 24 20:07 UTC] No.41907989[source]▶
As a UK resident and TV owner (who does not need a license), I wouldn't even mind that much if I was required to pay just for TV ownership. It's the "enforcement" system that's utterly broken (although I have no idea how it compares to other countries).

We have this ridiculous situation where I'm not required to pay (so I don't), yet the TV licensing people are allowed (required?) to send me junk mail week after week trying to trick me into thinking I do need to pay them.

replies(1): >>41908143 #
DrillShopper ◴[21 Oct 24 20:20 UTC] No.41908143[source]▶
What is the reason that you don't have to pay?
replies(1): >>41908204 #
1. Retr0id ◴[21 Oct 24 20:28 UTC] No.41908204[source]▶
I don't watch broadcast TV or other such TV-license-related services. My TV is a glorified computer monitor slash media player.