←back to thread

157 points milgrim | 1 comments | | HN request time: 0s | source
Show context
nordsieck ◴[] No.41904557[source]
It is particularly bad for a satellite in geostationary orbit to break up or fail. Satellites are packed as tightly as possible into that orbit due to its economic importance (it's very useful for a satellite, particularly communications satellites, to always be over the same part of the Earth), so there is a higher than normal likelihood that this could be seriously disruptive.
replies(7): >>41904586 #>>41904693 #>>41904725 #>>41905123 #>>41905207 #>>41905406 #>>41906037 #
accrual ◴[] No.41904586[source]
Indeed, Intelsat 33e has a couple nearby neighbors in similar orbits and inclinations.

    ID      Name                    Orbit   Incl.
    98050A  ASTRA 2A                57.2    4.93
    09017A  WGS F2 (USA 204)        57.5    0.01
    14023B  KAZSAT-3                58.5    0.02
    12008A  BEIDOU-2 G5             58.7    2.10
    16053B  INTELSAT 33E (IS-33E)   60.0    0.04 <-- 20+ debris components
    19014A  WGS 10 (USA 291)        60.3    0.01
    04007A  ABS-4 (MOBISAT-1)       61.0    3.86
    10008A  EWS-G2 (GOES 15)        61.5    0.04
    19049B  INTELSAT 39 (IS-39)     62.0    0.02
https://www.satsig.net/sslist.htm
replies(1): >>41904962 #
nordsieck ◴[] No.41904962[source]
Looks like WGS-10 is the closest.

From Wikipedia, it looks like it's a USSF satellite launched in 2019 with a service life of 14 years. It provides wideband communications to DoD customers.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/USA-291

replies(1): >>41905263 #
bryanlarsen ◴[] No.41905263[source]
It's 0.3 degrees ahead in orbit. Which means the debris needs to speed up to collide. It's possible if the break-up was explosive, but most, if not all of the debris is more likely to stay at the same velocity or slow down.
replies(5): >>41905461 #>>41905536 #>>41905660 #>>41906391 #>>41906627 #
Reubachi ◴[] No.41906391[source]
How does one tell the dynamics of orbital objects/debris relative to forces acting on them? Is there a name for this type of field?
replies(2): >>41906752 #>>41907545 #
1. visviva ◴[] No.41907545[source]
Astrodynamics