←back to thread

The AI Investment Boom

(www.apricitas.io)
271 points m-hodges | 1 comments | 20 Oct 24 14:56 UTC | HN request time: 0.001s | source
Show context
GolfPopper ◴[20 Oct 24 20:15 UTC] No.41898170[source]▶
I've yet to find an "AI" that doesn't seamlessly hallucinate, and I don't see how "AIs" that hallucinate will ever be useful outside niche applications.
replies(12): >>41898196 #>>41898203 #>>41898630 #>>41898961 #>>41899137 #>>41899339 #>>41900217 #>>41901033 #>>41903589 #>>41903712 #>>41905312 #>>41908344 #
cma ◴[21 Oct 24 05:52 UTC] No.41901033[source]▶
Still useful for anything you can verify.
replies(1): >>41904232 #
johnnyanmac ◴[21 Oct 24 13:59 UTC] No.41904232[source]▶
verifying needs experts to confirm. experts are expensive and are the people they want to replace. No one on either side of the transaction wants to utilize an expert.

So you see the issue. and the intent.

replies(2): >>41907223 #>>41908177 #
1. cma ◴[21 Oct 24 18:58 UTC] No.41907223{3}[source]▶
It has been a game changer for code stuff, surfacing libraries and APIs I didn't know about. And I can verify them with the documentation.

And I don't think that's just for assisting experts: it would be extremely helpful to beginners too as long as they have the mindset that it can be wrong.